EMS Protocol of the Week - Excited Delirium

This week’s protocol was requested from one of our residents following the recent surge in coverage of Elijah McClain’s 2019 death and the associated controversy around the use of ketamine as a sedation agent. Protocol 530, Excited Delirium, discusses more than just ketamine administration, and I’d like to use this space to discuss the protocol overall without making this a ketamine-specific email. That being said, this is the only one out of all the NYC REMAC protocols to even mention ketamine, so I’ll touch on it a bit here, and hopefully we can use this to kick off a conversation about our own perspectives and experiences with administering ketamine, whether in-hospital or out-of-hospital. First thing to note about this protocol is that it is not a protocol for anxiety, nor is it for simple agitation. This is not supposed to be the go-to for the little granny with dementia who’s shouting expletives at passerby. Excited delirium is intended to encapsulate the belligerent, aggressive, potentially violent patient, for a couple of key reasons. For one, same as in the ED, you want to be able to quickly intervene on patients that pose an acute threat to themselves and/or first responders. Further than that, depending on etiology, you want to be able to quickly control the patient that is truly hypermetabolic, preferably without prolonged physical restraint, in order to prevent worsening hyperthermia or acidosis, either of which can be rapidly lethal if unmitigated. Protocol 530 starts with reference to BLS procedures, which put a large emphasis on rapidly ensuring scene safety, both by attempting verbal de-escalation but also having a low threshold for requesting assistance from law enforcement. For the ALS component, note that the default Standing Order for continued patient resistance is 10mg of IM midazolam. Not “up to,” not a weight-based calculation, just a flat 10mg dose. A quick note about that. The reasoning is, broadly, to quickly control the potential threat to first responders with the lowest potential for needlestick injuries in the process (whether from placing an IV or from attempting multiple IM injections). Yes, there is controversy about this dosing strategy. Ideally, if ALS has a 30kg geriatric in true excited delirium requiring medication, the paramedic will be cognizant enough to call OLMC for a Discretionary Order for a lower dose. What I can tell you is that during my time with FDNY, we looked at data surrounding administering 10mg midazolam IM for excited delirium in NYC and found it to be relatively safe, with the most common complication being hypotension that was responsive to IV fluids (the next SO in the protocol). If adequate sedation is achieved with the SO midazolam, great, EMS will package the patient and transport. If that dose somehow isn’t enough, expect an OLMC call for one of the MCO’s listed in the attached pdf. The request may be for a repeat dose of IM midazolam (this time “up to 10mg”) or IM lorazepam if the crew carries it. Another option is IN benzos (although these tend to not be preferred due to patients spitting them back at providers), or IV/IO benzos if the initial SO midazolam briefly calmed the patient enough for the crew to obtain vascular access. Finally, there is the option for ketamine, either IN (again, often not preferred) or IM. Now, a few things about ketamine. Recognize that many EMS services in NYC do not yet carry ketamine (although obviously our own Maimo medics do). This has been another example of how practice in the prehospital setting has developed somewhat behind that in the ED or the rest of the hospital. Similarly to how ketamine has surged in popularity in the ED over the last several years, so too is it now getting lots of attention in EMS systems. However, the “ketamine can do no wrong” mentality started to stall a few years ago after some studies began to show some adverse effects from its use. One of the most impactful papers was the 2016 study from Hennepin County, MN, comparing prehospital ketamine to haloperidol, which showed superior sedation but a worse side effect profile, specifically a significantly increased rate of subsequent intubation. Why? While this may be partially related to ketamine-induced laryngospasm, there is an argument that a large part of this is explained by inexperience with ketamine and unfamiliarity with how to manage a dissociated patient. There is also a question of correlation between ketamine dosing and adverse effects. The Hennepin study, along with many other EMS systems, utilizes a 5mg/kg dosing strategy for IM ketamine; for context, Elijah McClain appears to have been given a good deal more. Our own protocol here in NYC calls for 2-4mg/kg IM. Of note, a more recent study by the same Hennepin group comparing prehospital ketamine to midazolam was suspended after public backlash over informed consent with regards to ketamine administration. Finally, note that this protocol explicitly states in its title that it is for adults only. For NYC EMS, although you are considered a minor until the age of 18, you are only a pediatric patient until the age of 15. What this means is that you very well may encounter 16-year-olds who have received midazolam as Standing Order, and you may receive OLMC calls for large, violent 14-year-olds requesting a Discretionary Order for sedation. In the latter case, use your judgment, but remember to consider patient and provider safety, and if you do authorize the use of sedation, be sure to get an accurate weight for dosing. Very interested in hearing all of your takes on prehospital management of excited delirium, in-hospital and out-of-hospital (CLINICAL) ketamine use, and anything in between! Feel free to reply to this email chain, and in the meantime, keep checking out www.nycremsco.org and the protocols binder!

–– David Eng, MD Assistant Medical Director, Emergency Medical Services Attending Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine Maimonides Medical Center

 · 
Share

POTD: Retropharyngeal Abscess

Retropharyngeal Abscess


What is it?

  • Polymicrobial abscess in space between posterior pharyngeal wall and prevertebral fascia

  • Adults: Usually due to direct extension of local infection (ex. ludwig's angina, pharyngitis, dental abscess etc.)

  • Peds: Usually due to suppurative changes in local lymph nodes from an infection in the head or neck

  • Can also be caused from trauma- falling with pencil in mouth


Presentation:

  • Patients may prefer to lay down to prevent abscess from collapsing the airway. If your suspicion is high enough, don't sit these patients up!

  • Patients will complain most commonly of: sore throat, fever, torticollis, dysphagia

  • In late stages will develop airway involvement (looks for stritor, change in phonation, drooling, neck stiffness, tripoding, SOB)


Diagnosis:

  • CT Neck with IV contrast

  • On CT you will see loss of definition between the anatomic spaces in the neck, stranding in the subcutaneous tissues, tissue enhancement, and frank abscess formation, the location of the findings indicates whether it is a parapharyngeal or retropharyngeal space infection

  • You can get a soft tissue neck x-ray, but if your suspicion is still high and the x-rays are equivocal, you should still get a CT

  • MRI is useful for assessing the extent of soft tissue involvement and for delineating vascular complications

Management:

  • Get Anesthesia/ ENT involved early if there is any degree of upper airway obstruction!

  • These signs include: neck extension/head in sniffing position, stritor, change in phonation, drooling, neck stiffness, tripoding, SOB,  retractions

  • Coordinate with Anesthesia/ ENT to secure an airway (Tracheostomy in the OR or fiberoptic intubation should be considered)

  • If there is no airway compromise, consult ENT because many of these patients require I&D/ needle aspiration in the OR

  • Retropharyngeal abscess <2.5cm without airway compromise can potentially receive a trial of empiric IV abx for 24-48 hours without drainage  

  •  Antibiotics (Covering: GAS, Staph aureus, respiratory anaerobes, +/-MRSA)  options include: Ampicillin/Sulbactam 3g IV  or Clindamycin 600-900mg IV or Cefoxitin 2gm IV  

  • Admit

 · 
Share

POTD: Goals of Care Conversation and Prognostication

POTD: Goals of Care Conversation and Prognostication

This is part 2 of the POTD covering patient communication over sensitive topics and my final POTD.  Sorry this is a long one that probably could be two separate POTD. Given that it is my final POTD, I feel like prognostication should be mentioned as it is important for me internally so that I feel comfortable when recommending (yes, recommending) DNR/DNI.  I am naturally pro Full Code as some of my co-residents can attest to (y’all better put me on ECMO and visit me at Palm Gardens), but the second part of this POTD will go over some research of prognosis after cardiac arrest and intubation.  If this isn’t a mental hang up for you, the first half will go over the basics of a goals of care conversation.

 

Basics of a goals of care conversation

 

Ask what they know. – find out about what they know, allow the patient/family to express emotions

Hello, I am Dr. X.  What have you heard about what has happened today to your loved one?

 

Break bad news

Warning shot: I am afraid I have serious news.  Would it be OK if I share?

Headline: Your [mother] is not breathing well from COVID with her other health issues.  I am worried she could become/is very sick and may even die.

 

Establish urgency. Align with patient/family.

We need to work together quickly to make the best decisions for her care.

I want to do what is best for the patient.

 

Baseline function

To decide which treatments might help your mother the most, I need to know more about her.  What type of activities was she doing day-to-day before this illness?

Has he/she been able to feed himself/herself?

Is he/she bedbound?

Has the patient been coming in and out of the hospital?

 

Patient’s Values (select the appropriate question) – what is the acceptable quality of life

There are times when the pt’s values are clear. “I don’t want to be on life support. I would rather die.” But those times are rare. More often, family members are unsure and these values questions are often asked in a series. The last question is the hardest one. Work up to that one if the patient or family cannot give a clear answer.

 

Has she previously expressed wishes about the kinds of medical care she would or would not want?

If time is short, what is most important to her?

How much would she be willing to go through for the possibility of more time?

What abilities are so crucial to her that she would consider life not worth living if she lost them?

Are there states she would consider worse than dying?

 

Summarize – This creates higher alignment with patient/family. Ask Tell Ask.

What I hear is ____.  Did I get that right?

What I heard you say is that you understand that the pneumonia is very severe today. Your father said that the minimum quality of life that he would want is to be able to read and have conversations with his family. Did I get that right?

 

Make Recommendations (We try not to be paternalistic, but patients and family do not understand prognosis, what the longer course after intubation is, what the trach and vent unit looks like. It is ok, if not our job to give a recommendation.)

Based on what you know about the patient’s baseline medical problems and current illness, make your best prediction about the patient’s prognosis. What is the likelihood that the patient that the patient will achieve his/her minimal quality of life? 

 

Given that your father has no medical problems, and wants us to do everything to keep him alive, I would recommend intubation and chest compressions as needed.  We will see if he improves on the ventilator, if not than we can revisit this conversation.

Given that your mother has significant medical co-morbidities with her current severity of illness, it’s very unlikely that doing invasive and traumatic procedures like placing her on the ventilator, central lines, or chest compressions is going benefit her. I would recommend giving her comfort care and provide pain medication as needed. We are still going to give her antibiotics and non-invasive interventions if that is her wish.

(If they ask, CPR can break ribs, damage internal organs; generally speaking I've been moving away from talking about the details of the procedures.  Most of the times, they don't ask about the specifics; they just don't want anything traumatic happening to their loved one. Of course if they ask, being on the ventilator involves placing a breathing tube down their throat which is traumatic, and the patient can become dependent on the ventilator.)

This is the link to the great 30 min EMCRIT podcast that goes over this topic

https://emcrit.org/emcrit/rapid-code-status-conversations/

 

Prognostication

It’s hard to tell prognosis for young patients with serious underlying conditions like cerebral palsy requiring trach and peg.  There is less variability in prognosis for older patient with medical co-morbidities. Generally, for goals of care, we are mostly concerned about two things, CPR and intubation, so we are going to take a look at both of these interventions and see how beneficial each is.

 

Cardiac Arrest

The prognosis of patients post cardiac arrest is extremely poor. Many studies of out of hospital arrest done over the world cite a 1-year mortality rate of ~88-92% (worsen in US ofc). Half of the survivors will have severe neurologic deficits123. The data on in-hospital arrest isn’t much better. The in-hospital survival rate is around 20%, dropping to ~10% by the 1-year mark4. I find it quite interesting that survival rates and neurologic outcomes are 15-20% lower for patients who arrested during nights or weekends (off-hours)…yikes5. One of the key prognostication factors seems to be your initial rhythm; if you have a shockable rhythm you are 2-3x more likely to survive.

 

Intubation

For patients > 65 who are intubated, there is a 33% in-hospital mortality rate, which doesn’t sound so bad. 24% of the survivors are discharged to home, and the rest to a skilled nursing facility or a long-term acute care facility (LTAC). This other study also done by the same author found that for the survivors, the median survival after discharge was only 163 days. The 1/5 year survival rates were 45% and 18% at LTAC. Surveys done at these facilities shows that most of these patients have terrible quality of life; to the credit of these facilities about 60% of the patients are discharged home. Also, in the Kei study, in which the patients was admitted with mild to moderate disability (walks with walker, dependent on some ADLS) 56% developed severe disability post intubation (bedbound, depending on all ADLs)67.This article found that for weaning the ventilator, age is not the dominant factor in predicting outcomes; having multiple co-morbidity burdens is a much better indicator8.

 

My takeaways from all this was that CPR was a lot less beneficial than I expected. Though the prognosis of intubation is poor, it does seem to convey significantly more benefit than CPR.  I say this because at Maimo (I’m not sure for other hospitals), it seems like goals of care keeps these two as a package deal (especially in the ED).  I think inpatient is more likely to be ok with having patient families accept one or the other.  I feel like I am now more willing to accept intubation only, no CPR.

The other side of the coin is that intubation does run a much higher risk of keeping the patient alive in what some could consider a perpetual state with poor quality of life.  The EMCRIT podcast goes over the idea that maybe the goal of treatment is a dignified life rather than a cure. If you are depending on others for all ADLs with barely any mental cognition, is that a dignified life? Of course, this has a lot to do with one’s beliefs, and it’s subjective. Just something to think about.

My last takeaway is that a significant portion ~5-10% of even elderly after CPR does recover with good neurologic function.  You don’t want to condemn these people to death. It seems like age is not the best predictor for poor prognosis but rather medical comorbidities, low baseline function, and illness severity.  My point is that if there is a 78F with just HTN and had perfect ADLs coming in for a modifiable illness like pneumonia, she has a great chance of returning to baseline function.  Unless specified otherwise, I would recommend full code in that scenario.  A 73M with CHF, DM, HTN, HLD, CAD w/ stents with baseline dementia (which is a lot of these patients) have a far worse prognosis. Depending on the wishes of the family and the patient, I am much more likely to recommend comfort care.

I want to give a special thank you to Dr. Turchiano for helping me with these last two POTDs.  I also wanted to give a plug for his amazing palliative care selective that he ran last year for third years who are interested and second years who might be interested.  If you are interested, please don’t hesitate to send him an email.

 

1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25399396/

2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25399397/

3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25355914/

4. https://www.resuscitationjournal.com/article/S0300-9572(18)30850-5/fulltext

5. https://www.dicardiology.com/article/hospital-cardiac-arrest-survival-has-improved-lower-survival-nights-weekends

6. https://emcrit.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/jgs.15361.pdf

7. https://www.jpsmjournal.com/article/S0885-3924(20)30436-X/fulltext?rss=yes#back-bib32

8. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jgs.12597