POTD: Goals of Care Conversation and Prognostication

POTD: Goals of Care Conversation and Prognostication

This is part 2 of the POTD covering patient communication over sensitive topics and my final POTD.  Sorry this is a long one that probably could be two separate POTD. Given that it is my final POTD, I feel like prognostication should be mentioned as it is important for me internally so that I feel comfortable when recommending (yes, recommending) DNR/DNI.  I am naturally pro Full Code as some of my co-residents can attest to (y’all better put me on ECMO and visit me at Palm Gardens), but the second part of this POTD will go over some research of prognosis after cardiac arrest and intubation.  If this isn’t a mental hang up for you, the first half will go over the basics of a goals of care conversation.

 

Basics of a goals of care conversation

 

Ask what they know. – find out about what they know, allow the patient/family to express emotions

Hello, I am Dr. X.  What have you heard about what has happened today to your loved one?

 

Break bad news

Warning shot: I am afraid I have serious news.  Would it be OK if I share?

Headline: Your [mother] is not breathing well from COVID with her other health issues.  I am worried she could become/is very sick and may even die.

 

Establish urgency. Align with patient/family.

We need to work together quickly to make the best decisions for her care.

I want to do what is best for the patient.

 

Baseline function

To decide which treatments might help your mother the most, I need to know more about her.  What type of activities was she doing day-to-day before this illness?

Has he/she been able to feed himself/herself?

Is he/she bedbound?

Has the patient been coming in and out of the hospital?

 

Patient’s Values (select the appropriate question) – what is the acceptable quality of life

There are times when the pt’s values are clear. “I don’t want to be on life support. I would rather die.” But those times are rare. More often, family members are unsure and these values questions are often asked in a series. The last question is the hardest one. Work up to that one if the patient or family cannot give a clear answer.

 

Has she previously expressed wishes about the kinds of medical care she would or would not want?

If time is short, what is most important to her?

How much would she be willing to go through for the possibility of more time?

What abilities are so crucial to her that she would consider life not worth living if she lost them?

Are there states she would consider worse than dying?

 

Summarize – This creates higher alignment with patient/family. Ask Tell Ask.

What I hear is ____.  Did I get that right?

What I heard you say is that you understand that the pneumonia is very severe today. Your father said that the minimum quality of life that he would want is to be able to read and have conversations with his family. Did I get that right?

 

Make Recommendations (We try not to be paternalistic, but patients and family do not understand prognosis, what the longer course after intubation is, what the trach and vent unit looks like. It is ok, if not our job to give a recommendation.)

Based on what you know about the patient’s baseline medical problems and current illness, make your best prediction about the patient’s prognosis. What is the likelihood that the patient that the patient will achieve his/her minimal quality of life? 

 

Given that your father has no medical problems, and wants us to do everything to keep him alive, I would recommend intubation and chest compressions as needed.  We will see if he improves on the ventilator, if not than we can revisit this conversation.

Given that your mother has significant medical co-morbidities with her current severity of illness, it’s very unlikely that doing invasive and traumatic procedures like placing her on the ventilator, central lines, or chest compressions is going benefit her. I would recommend giving her comfort care and provide pain medication as needed. We are still going to give her antibiotics and non-invasive interventions if that is her wish.

(If they ask, CPR can break ribs, damage internal organs; generally speaking I've been moving away from talking about the details of the procedures.  Most of the times, they don't ask about the specifics; they just don't want anything traumatic happening to their loved one. Of course if they ask, being on the ventilator involves placing a breathing tube down their throat which is traumatic, and the patient can become dependent on the ventilator.)

This is the link to the great 30 min EMCRIT podcast that goes over this topic

https://emcrit.org/emcrit/rapid-code-status-conversations/

 

Prognostication

It’s hard to tell prognosis for young patients with serious underlying conditions like cerebral palsy requiring trach and peg.  There is less variability in prognosis for older patient with medical co-morbidities. Generally, for goals of care, we are mostly concerned about two things, CPR and intubation, so we are going to take a look at both of these interventions and see how beneficial each is.

 

Cardiac Arrest

The prognosis of patients post cardiac arrest is extremely poor. Many studies of out of hospital arrest done over the world cite a 1-year mortality rate of ~88-92% (worsen in US ofc). Half of the survivors will have severe neurologic deficits123. The data on in-hospital arrest isn’t much better. The in-hospital survival rate is around 20%, dropping to ~10% by the 1-year mark4. I find it quite interesting that survival rates and neurologic outcomes are 15-20% lower for patients who arrested during nights or weekends (off-hours)…yikes5. One of the key prognostication factors seems to be your initial rhythm; if you have a shockable rhythm you are 2-3x more likely to survive.

 

Intubation

For patients > 65 who are intubated, there is a 33% in-hospital mortality rate, which doesn’t sound so bad. 24% of the survivors are discharged to home, and the rest to a skilled nursing facility or a long-term acute care facility (LTAC). This other study also done by the same author found that for the survivors, the median survival after discharge was only 163 days. The 1/5 year survival rates were 45% and 18% at LTAC. Surveys done at these facilities shows that most of these patients have terrible quality of life; to the credit of these facilities about 60% of the patients are discharged home. Also, in the Kei study, in which the patients was admitted with mild to moderate disability (walks with walker, dependent on some ADLS) 56% developed severe disability post intubation (bedbound, depending on all ADLs)67.This article found that for weaning the ventilator, age is not the dominant factor in predicting outcomes; having multiple co-morbidity burdens is a much better indicator8.

 

My takeaways from all this was that CPR was a lot less beneficial than I expected. Though the prognosis of intubation is poor, it does seem to convey significantly more benefit than CPR.  I say this because at Maimo (I’m not sure for other hospitals), it seems like goals of care keeps these two as a package deal (especially in the ED).  I think inpatient is more likely to be ok with having patient families accept one or the other.  I feel like I am now more willing to accept intubation only, no CPR.

The other side of the coin is that intubation does run a much higher risk of keeping the patient alive in what some could consider a perpetual state with poor quality of life.  The EMCRIT podcast goes over the idea that maybe the goal of treatment is a dignified life rather than a cure. If you are depending on others for all ADLs with barely any mental cognition, is that a dignified life? Of course, this has a lot to do with one’s beliefs, and it’s subjective. Just something to think about.

My last takeaway is that a significant portion ~5-10% of even elderly after CPR does recover with good neurologic function.  You don’t want to condemn these people to death. It seems like age is not the best predictor for poor prognosis but rather medical comorbidities, low baseline function, and illness severity.  My point is that if there is a 78F with just HTN and had perfect ADLs coming in for a modifiable illness like pneumonia, she has a great chance of returning to baseline function.  Unless specified otherwise, I would recommend full code in that scenario.  A 73M with CHF, DM, HTN, HLD, CAD w/ stents with baseline dementia (which is a lot of these patients) have a far worse prognosis. Depending on the wishes of the family and the patient, I am much more likely to recommend comfort care.

I want to give a special thank you to Dr. Turchiano for helping me with these last two POTDs.  I also wanted to give a plug for his amazing palliative care selective that he ran last year for third years who are interested and second years who might be interested.  If you are interested, please don’t hesitate to send him an email.

 

1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25399396/

2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25399397/

3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25355914/

4. https://www.resuscitationjournal.com/article/S0300-9572(18)30850-5/fulltext

5. https://www.dicardiology.com/article/hospital-cardiac-arrest-survival-has-improved-lower-survival-nights-weekends

6. https://emcrit.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/jgs.15361.pdf

7. https://www.jpsmjournal.com/article/S0885-3924(20)30436-X/fulltext?rss=yes#back-bib32

8. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jgs.12597

 


POTD: Breaking Bad News

POTD: Breaking Bad News

As we move from med school to intern year, intern year to second year, second year to third year, we start to take on more responsibility in having goals of care discussion and breaking bad news.  This was something I struggled with especially at the beginning, and I am no master now by any means.  There is no good way to tell a family member that his/her loved one died over the phone, but we can try to mitigate the pain. If this is something that you have trouble with, I just want to provide a basic guide as a starting point from which you can develop your own style. We start today with breaking bad news.

A basic mnemonic for delivering bad news is the SPIKE mnemonic.

S: setting up the interview

P: assessing the patient’s or patient’s family’s perception

I: obtaining the patient’s invitation

K: giving Knowledge and information to the patient

E: addressing the patient’s Emotions with empathic responses

S: strategy and Summary

Setting up

Make sure you know the patient’s info (lab and other results), and know how to explain everything without using Jargon

Find somewhere private.  I usually use the waiting area by the entrance of North side.  If that is being used, I just try to find a private enclosed area (unused resus bay, etc.)

Give a proper introduction.

              I am Dr. X, I’ve been taking care of pt Y.

Assessing the patient’s Perception

Find out how much the patient or family knows, in particular how serious he/she thinks the illness is.

              What do you know about your current condition?

              What did your doctor tell you about your condition?

Obtaining the patient’s Invitation

Find out how much the patient wants to know.  Sometimes, a health care proxy does not want their loved one to know their diagnosis or prognosis.

If this turns out to be something serious, are you the kind of person who wants to know all the details?

Would you like me to tell you the details of the diagnosis?

Giving Knowledge and information to the patient

              If possible, start from what the patient already knows. Reinforce those parts which are correct.

Start with a warning shot:

I am sorry, but I have bad news to tell you.

              I am sorry to say that your illness is very serious. 

Make sure to tell the patients 4 crucial things: Diagnosis, Treatment Plan, Prognosis, and Support

              Give the information in small checks without jargon

              Check for understanding, repeat, and clarify

                             Am I making sense?

                             This is a lot to take in, do you follow what I am saying?

Listen to patient’s agenda

What are some of your concerns? Try to answer to the best of your ability. Be honest about what you don’t know.  Most of the times you can tell the patient that specific things will be better answered by a specialist.

Addressing the patient’s emotions with empathic responses

Patient’s response can vary from silence to distress, denial, or anger. Observe the patient and give them time. Acknowledge any shock and ask what they are feeling. Allow silence. Don’t argue.

I can’t imagine how difficult it is for you to hear about this. What are you feeling right now?  It is completely understandable that you would feel (distressed, angered, frustrated etc.) by this.

Strategy and Summary

Patients will look to us to help make sense of the confusion and provide plans for the future. Identify sources of support for the patient. Ask for further questions. Tell them the next steps. Prepare for the worst and hope for the best.

              Do you have any family or friends you would like to speak to?

              The next step is….

Here are two basic sample scripts that come up commonly.

Telling a family member that their loved one has died over the phone.

Hello, I am Dr. X calling from Maimonides Medical Center. I am the physician that took care of patient Y.

Where are you right now? Are you somewhere private? (if driving, advise the person to pull over and park)

I am sorry I have some bad news.

Your family member X has died. (don’t say passed, moved on ect…)

Pause: I can’t imagine how difficult it is for you to hear this. 

Give brief description of what happened; the medical details are not important.

(Mr. X came with severe difficulty breathing. So much so that his heart stopped. We tried to resuscitate him but we could not revive him.)         

Wait

This must be overwhelming

How are you feeling?

It is completely understandable that you would feel that way.

You do not have to come right away, but would you like to him/her? You can come with another family member or friend if you would like.

We are at Maimonides Medical Center (give address if necessary). We are located in the North Side Emergency Room.

If you have any other questions, you can call me at Spectralink number.

Giving a Diagnosis of Cancer

Your CT results are back. I am sorry I have some bad news.

Your CT shows a mass in your lung as well as your liver concerning for cancer.

I can’t say for sure what it is because you will need a biopsy.

Unfortunately, if the mass has moved to multiple organs, that shows more severe disease.

I can’t imagine how difficult it is for you to hear about this. What are you feeling right now?  It is completely understandable that you would feel (distressed, angered, frustrated etc.) by this.

Do you have any family or friends you would like to speak to?

What are some of your concerns? …. I am a general emergency room doctor. I do not know the answer to that question. An oncologist will be able to give you a better answer.

The next step is to speak to an oncologist.  I will you follow up with our rapid cancer center.

Do you have any other questions?

I remember in second year; I wrote down a script for giving bad news/goals of care and memorized it. I found this helpful to my delivery when it came up. I make changes to what I say depending on the patient/family (emotion, medical literacy, etc.), but the base is the same.

 


EMS Protocol of the Week - Ventricular Tachycardia with a Pulse/Wide Complex Tachycardia of Uncertain Type

This week’s gentle reminder to check the protocol binder comes from a recent OLMC call I had with one of our very own residents! I won’t name names, but apparently he’s been “too busy” to keep up with my emails, and my feelings have been hurt ever since!

Cough.

ekg.png

Anyway. Protocol 505-C, Ventricular Tachycardia with a Pulse/Wide Complex Tachycardia of Uncertain Type, is one of a series of four separate protocols dealing with different types of cardiac dysrhythmias (3 tachy, 1 brady). The tachyarrhythmia protocols all have some overlap, but I think it’ll be helpful to look at them one at a time, and since we recently utilized 505-C in a call, it seemed like a good place to start! Here’s the call:

Family called 911 for a 91-year-old female with a week of worsening lethargy and intermittent chest pain. On arrival, patient was pale, with a heart rate ranging from 130s-160s and a blood pressure of 60s/40s. Patient had a weak radial pulse and was making some purposeful movements, but per family she was definitely more lethargic and mildly confused compared to baseline. Here’s the prehospital 12-lead for your convenience!

What do you do in the moment? Is this wide complex tachycardia a VT? AFib with aberrancy? Does it matter right now?

There’s no mysterious, inscrutable EMS secret here. The patient was hypoperfusing from an unstable tachyarrhythmia and needed synchronized cardioversion. Guess who can do that? Paramedics! It’s Standing Order under this protocol once they recognize the patient has unstable (check!), wide complex (easy!) tachycardia (piece of cake!). The SO’s for this protocol also include the initial 150mg bolus of Amiodarone before diving into MCO’s for the patient who may need something more (in this case, continued cardioversion, magnesium, calcium, or bicarb).

So why did the crew call OLMC, if cardioversion and Amiodarone are Standing Order? There were a couple reasons. The first was for more of a discussion with an ED doc about the case. Remember that OLMC can often be framed as analogous to a consultation between a paramedic and you, the Emergency Medicine specialist. In this case, how comfortable would most of you be with zapping a 91-year-old without at least bouncing the idea off someone else? Would you try Amiodarone first? Those sort of talking points are an entirely valid reason to call.

The second reason for calling, once we were all on the same page about zapping the 91-year-old patient, was to discuss sedation medications, since it’s generally poor manners to electrocute an awake 91-year-old patient. True EMS PotW fans will remember from the Prehospital Sedation email that OLMC approval is required for prehospital sedation meds, and dedicated superfans will remember that the only options listed are Etomidate and benzos, neither of which is my preferred choice for hypotensive patients like this one. So instead, we opted to give Fentanyl as a Discretionary Order, and guess what? Patient tolerated the cardioversion, heart rate improved to the low 100s, BP improved to 100s/60s, and mental status improved immensely (to quote the medic after they brought the patient to us in the ED, “when we first got there, we couldn’t get her to talk to us; now, we can’t get her to stop”). All that was left for us to do once the patient got to the ED was…well, pretty much nothing. Labs, repeat EKG, cardiology consult, admission.

Once again, the medicine is all the same as what you already know! But hopefully this keeps helping familiarize you all with how much patient care can be accomplished with good communication with our prehospital colleagues.

www.nycremsco.org and the protocol binder by the phone. Use them! 

David Eng, MD

Assistant Medical Director, Emergency Medical Services

Attending Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine

Maimonides Medical Center