EMS Protocol of the Week - Excited Delirium

This week’s protocol was requested from one of our residents following the recent surge in coverage of Elijah McClain’s 2019 death and the associated controversy around the use of ketamine as a sedation agent. Protocol 530, Excited Delirium, discusses more than just ketamine administration, and I’d like to use this space to discuss the protocol overall without making this a ketamine-specific email. That being said, this is the only one out of all the NYC REMAC protocols to even mention ketamine, so I’ll touch on it a bit here, and hopefully we can use this to kick off a conversation about our own perspectives and experiences with administering ketamine, whether in-hospital or out-of-hospital. First thing to note about this protocol is that it is not a protocol for anxiety, nor is it for simple agitation. This is not supposed to be the go-to for the little granny with dementia who’s shouting expletives at passerby. Excited delirium is intended to encapsulate the belligerent, aggressive, potentially violent patient, for a couple of key reasons. For one, same as in the ED, you want to be able to quickly intervene on patients that pose an acute threat to themselves and/or first responders. Further than that, depending on etiology, you want to be able to quickly control the patient that is truly hypermetabolic, preferably without prolonged physical restraint, in order to prevent worsening hyperthermia or acidosis, either of which can be rapidly lethal if unmitigated. Protocol 530 starts with reference to BLS procedures, which put a large emphasis on rapidly ensuring scene safety, both by attempting verbal de-escalation but also having a low threshold for requesting assistance from law enforcement. For the ALS component, note that the default Standing Order for continued patient resistance is 10mg of IM midazolam. Not “up to,” not a weight-based calculation, just a flat 10mg dose. A quick note about that. The reasoning is, broadly, to quickly control the potential threat to first responders with the lowest potential for needlestick injuries in the process (whether from placing an IV or from attempting multiple IM injections). Yes, there is controversy about this dosing strategy. Ideally, if ALS has a 30kg geriatric in true excited delirium requiring medication, the paramedic will be cognizant enough to call OLMC for a Discretionary Order for a lower dose. What I can tell you is that during my time with FDNY, we looked at data surrounding administering 10mg midazolam IM for excited delirium in NYC and found it to be relatively safe, with the most common complication being hypotension that was responsive to IV fluids (the next SO in the protocol). If adequate sedation is achieved with the SO midazolam, great, EMS will package the patient and transport. If that dose somehow isn’t enough, expect an OLMC call for one of the MCO’s listed in the attached pdf. The request may be for a repeat dose of IM midazolam (this time “up to 10mg”) or IM lorazepam if the crew carries it. Another option is IN benzos (although these tend to not be preferred due to patients spitting them back at providers), or IV/IO benzos if the initial SO midazolam briefly calmed the patient enough for the crew to obtain vascular access. Finally, there is the option for ketamine, either IN (again, often not preferred) or IM. Now, a few things about ketamine. Recognize that many EMS services in NYC do not yet carry ketamine (although obviously our own Maimo medics do). This has been another example of how practice in the prehospital setting has developed somewhat behind that in the ED or the rest of the hospital. Similarly to how ketamine has surged in popularity in the ED over the last several years, so too is it now getting lots of attention in EMS systems. However, the “ketamine can do no wrong” mentality started to stall a few years ago after some studies began to show some adverse effects from its use. One of the most impactful papers was the 2016 study from Hennepin County, MN, comparing prehospital ketamine to haloperidol, which showed superior sedation but a worse side effect profile, specifically a significantly increased rate of subsequent intubation. Why? While this may be partially related to ketamine-induced laryngospasm, there is an argument that a large part of this is explained by inexperience with ketamine and unfamiliarity with how to manage a dissociated patient. There is also a question of correlation between ketamine dosing and adverse effects. The Hennepin study, along with many other EMS systems, utilizes a 5mg/kg dosing strategy for IM ketamine; for context, Elijah McClain appears to have been given a good deal more. Our own protocol here in NYC calls for 2-4mg/kg IM. Of note, a more recent study by the same Hennepin group comparing prehospital ketamine to midazolam was suspended after public backlash over informed consent with regards to ketamine administration. Finally, note that this protocol explicitly states in its title that it is for adults only. For NYC EMS, although you are considered a minor until the age of 18, you are only a pediatric patient until the age of 15. What this means is that you very well may encounter 16-year-olds who have received midazolam as Standing Order, and you may receive OLMC calls for large, violent 14-year-olds requesting a Discretionary Order for sedation. In the latter case, use your judgment, but remember to consider patient and provider safety, and if you do authorize the use of sedation, be sure to get an accurate weight for dosing. Very interested in hearing all of your takes on prehospital management of excited delirium, in-hospital and out-of-hospital (CLINICAL) ketamine use, and anything in between! Feel free to reply to this email chain, and in the meantime, keep checking out www.nycremsco.org and the protocols binder!

–– David Eng, MD Assistant Medical Director, Emergency Medical Services Attending Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine Maimonides Medical Center

 · 

NYC EMS Protocol - Severe Nausea/Vomiting

Author: David Eng, MD

Assistant Medical Director, Emergency Medical Services

Attending Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine

Maimonides Medical Center

For reference here is a link to all of the NYC REMAC protocols as updated in 2019: https://www.nycremsco.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/04-ALS_Protocols-January-2019-vALS01012019B.pdf

Hey there, OLMC pros! Short one for review this week – Protocol 531, Severe Nausea/Vomiting.

Note that, compared to the previous protocols we’ve gone over, this one is entirely Standing Orders, meaning that paramedics can do all of these things, starting with fluid administration and vitals and including the administration of Ondansetron, without physician input. In other words, there are no Medical Control Options for paramedics to call in and request. So why do we care?

Well, first off, did you know that paramedics can give Ondansetron without physician approval? A whole whopping 8mg of it! Any chance you’ve given even more to a patient in the ED without realizing they’ve already got some in their system? Probably!

Now knowing that, take a look at the wording for Step 5, discussing the Standing Order for Ondansetron. If we’re really nitpicking and taking the phrasing as literally as possible (which we should be), what it says is that paramedics can give up to two weight-based doses, each up to 4mg, for a total of up to 8mg maximum. Sounds good so far. But what if you have someone that weighs 30kg, such that each weight-based dose is 3mg, so that after the two doses they’ve received 6mg but are still vomiting? Well, this might be an instance where EMS may call to request a Discretionary Order to give those last 2mg (totaling the 8mg maximum). Should you authorize it? Maybe, maybe not; use your discretion! Is this a young, healthy person with a particularly bad gastroenteritis, or could there be something more at play? Is an extra squirt of Zofran more likely to help or hurt? What information could help you decide?

Those questions speak to the broader point addressed in Step 4 – what other nefarious processes could be making someone vomit this much? Is the patient at risk for an atypical ACS presentation? Hopefully the crew checked an EKG, but if they didn’t prior to calling you, it may be worth politely asking for a 12-lead. Does the patient have diabetes, and this is all coming from DKA? Did the crew tell you the fingerstick? Maybe the right choice is to aggressively hydrate while transporting to the ED.

Once again, this is medicine that you all know, and if you’re dealing with this patient in the ED, you’d all know how to proceed with management. The trick is learning how your thought processes and actions interface with those of our prehospital providers. Once you realize that many patients’ presentation and treatment actually begin in the back of an ambulance and not just when they cross our sliding doors, you can begin to see how comprehensive emergency care here in the city really is.

 · 

NYC EMS Protocol - Ventricular Fibrillation/Pulseless Ventricular Tachycardia Arrest

Author: David Eng, MD

Assistant Medical Director, Emergency Medical Services

Attending Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine

Maimonides Medical Center

For reference here is a link to all of the NYC REMAC protocols as updated in 2019: https://www.nycremsco.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/04-ALS_Protocols-January-2019-vALS01012019B.pdf

Last time we addressed PEA/Asystole, so for this week’s protocol review, let’s get WILD and UNPREDICTABLE by going over EMS Protocol 503-A, Ventricular Fibrillation/Pulseless Ventricular Tachycardia!

You’ll notice that for VF/Pulseless VT, both the Standing Orders and Medical Control Options are similar to those seen in the PEA/Asystole protocol, with a couple of key differences:

- SOs have, predictably, a large focus on rhythm control, both with the initial bolus of Amiodarone (Step 9) and, more importantly, with frequent attempts at defibrillation if indicated. This follows from the understanding that the only consistently recognized beneficial interventions for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OOHCA) are early recognition of the arrest, early high quality CPR, and early defibrillation (when appropriate).

- MCOs now include options for the repeat Amiodarone bolus (Option A) if indicated, as well as the option for Magnesium Sulfate (Option C), such as you’d consider for things like Torsades de Pointes. 

As an aside, one thing not explicitly described in this protocol is the patient experiencing refractory VF. In these instances, no one would be faulted for instructing the crew to just transport the patient to the ED (MCO Option E), but another option you might consider would be Dual Sequence Defibrillation. Many paramedics are familiar with the concept at this point, and while the procedure is not explicitly described in current protocols, you have the option to advise the crew on attempting DSD as a Discretionary Order (DO) (neither an SO nor an MCO, but something the paramedic is equipped with and trained to use, just as an “off label use” in this instance, under physician direction). In this case, they obviously know how to use a defibrillator, except now you’d be asking them to use a second one, at the same time, in a slightly different location. Note that you cannot request interventions like Esmolol as a DO since, unlike a defibrillator, EMS crews neither carry nor receive training in how to use Esmolol. Just some food for thought.

 ·