VOTW: Intussusception

Today’s VOTW is brought to you by Dr. Fagan, Dr. Davitt and Dr. Lat!

A 2 year old male presented with abdominal pain and vomiting x1 day as well as cough and nasal congestion x2 days. On exam, he was clutching his abdomen in discomfort. A POCUS was performed which showed…

Clip 1 shows an abdominal ultrasound in the RUQ showing the classic “target sign” measureing 3.5cm, concerning for intussusception. You can visualize a smaller circular structure within a larger circular structure representing a part of bowel telescoping into the next part of the bowel. In the center, there are small circular hypoechoic lymph nodes surrounded by echogenic mesenteric fat that serves as the leading point of the intussusception.

Image 1. Target or donut sign

Ultrasound is the test of choice for intussusception and several studies have shown high sensitivity (94%) and specificity (99%) when POCUS is performed by PEM physicians (2).

POCUS for Intussusception

  • Most commonly occurs at the ileo-cecal junction and most commonly found in the right lower or right upper quadrant

  • Look for a target sign or donut sign (in transverse view, see above) or sandwich or pseudokidney sign (in longitudinal view, see below)

  • Diameter > 2cm (remember in-✌-ssusception)

    • May see mesenteric fat and lymph nodes in the center

Image 2. Pseudokidney or sandwhich sign

How to perform the study            

  • Use warm gel, have parents help distract, scan on parent's lap!

  • Use the linear probe

  • Picture frame pattern- start in the RLQ w/ probe marker to pts R scan towards the RUQ, then turn the probe w/ marker to pts head and scan towards the LUQ, then turn the probe w/ marker to pts R and scan down to the LLQ

  • Lawnmower pattern- start in the RLQ and lawnmower the entire abdomen scanning up and down from right to left with the probe marker to the pts R

  • Measure the diameter of the intussusseption if found

Image 3. Picture frame pattern

Back to the patient

Surgery was consulted, the patient underwent an air enema with resolution of the intussusseption. The patient was then discharged home.

References:

  1. Lin-Martore. PEM POCUS Series: Intussusception. https://www.aliem.com/pem-pocus-series-intussusception/

  2. Lin-Martore M, Kornblith AE, Kohn MA, Gottlieb M. Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Intussusception in Children Presenting to the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. West J Emerg Med. 2020 Jul 2;21(4):1008-1016. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.4.46241. PMID: 32726276; PMCID: PMC7390574.


Snake Bites

Coral snake bites are relatively rare but potentially serious envenomations caused by the bites of venomous coral snakes, belonging to the Elapidae family. The most prevalent coral snake species in North America is the Eastern Coral Snake (Micrurus fulvius). They are the classic “red touch yellow, kill a fellow.” Here is a summary of key aspects related to coral snake bites:

Mechanism of Toxin: Coral snake venom primarily consists of neurotoxins that affect the nervous system. These neurotoxins which include micrurotoxin and micruroidin, target the neuromuscular junction at acetylcholine receptors, to which they inhibit. This can lead to respiratory depression.

Clinical Features of Coral Snake Bites:

  1. Local Symptoms: Coral snake bites often do not cause significant local symptoms, such as pain or swelling, unlike many other venomous snake bites.

  2. Neurological Symptoms: The primary clinical manifestation is neurotoxicity, characterized by weakness, difficulty swallowing, slurred speech, and respiratory failure. Patients can develop cranial nerve palsies.

  3. Respiratory Distress: Resulting from respiratory muscle paralysis. This is the primary concern after a coral snake bite.

Evaluation and Lab Abnormalities:

  1. Clinical Assessment: Diagnosis is primarily clinical, based on the characteristic neurological symptoms and a history of coral snake bite.

  2. Laboratory Tests: Laboratory abnormalities may include an elevated creatine kinase (CK) level due to muscle breakdown, reflecting the neurotoxic effects of the venom.

  3. Coagulation Studies: Unlike some other venomous snake bites, coral snake envenomation usually does not cause coagulopathy. There are rare reported cases of DIC in coral snake bites, and given that patients may not remember the type of snake that bit them, it is not unreasonable to send DIC labs.

Medical Management:

  1. Supportive Care: Normal wound care, clean the wound, update tetanus, watch for cellulitis. Do not attempt to “suck out” the venom. No indication for using a tourniquet. Extremities should be monitored for compartment syndrome.

  2. Antivenom: The only specific treatment for coral snake envenomation is the administration of coral snake antivenom (Micrurus fulvius antivenom). However, this has been out of production and current stock is expected to end this year.

  3. Ventilatory Support: Patients with respiratory failure may require mechanical ventilation until the effects of the venom wear off. This should be handled aggressively. If the patient shows any signs of respiratory failure, promptly intubate them.

It's important to note that coral snake bites are uncommon, and the severity of envenomation can vary. These patients often require admission for monitoring.

 

Crotaline bites, commonly referred to as snakebites from pit vipers such as rattlesnakes, copperheads, and cottonmouths, are the other clinically significant snakes in NA. Here's a summary covering the mechanism of toxin, clinical features, evaluation, and medical management:

Mechanism of Toxin: Crotaline venom primarily consists of enzymes and peptides that exert cytotoxic, hemotoxic, and proteolytic effects. Metalloproteinases and serine proteinases in the venom contribute to swelling and damage to capillaries. They also lead to coagulation abnormalities. 

Clinical Features of Crotaline Bites:

1.       Local Effects: Immediate pain, swelling, and ecchymosis at the bite site. Local tissue necrosis may occur, especially with rattlesnake bites.

 

2.       Systemic Effects: Hematologic abnormalities, such as thrombocytopenia and coagulopathy, due to venom-induced consumption coagulopathy. Systemic symptoms like nausea, vomiting, weakness, dizziness, and diaphoresis also occur. Severe envenomation can lead to shock, respiratory distress, and organ failure.

Evaluation, Including Lab Abnormalities:

1.       Clinical Assessment: Assess local and systemic signs of envenomation. Evaluate for signs of compartment syndrome in the affected limb. Patients can develop hypotension from significant third spacing.

 

2.       Laboratory Studies: Complete blood count (CBC) to assess for thrombocytopenia and coagulopathy. Coagulation studies, including prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and fibrinogen levels. Blood chemistry to assess organ function.

Medical Management:

1.       Supportive Care: Normal wound care, clean the wound, update tetanus, watch for cellulitis. Do not attempt to “suck out” the venom. No indication for using a tourniquet. Extremities should be monitored for compartment syndrome. Limbs should be measured. Patients should receive IVF and may need pressors.

 

2.       Respiratory support: Patients with bites to the head and neck are at risk for airway compromise due to edema. Early intubation should be considered in these patients.

 

3.       Antivenom Therapy: There are two antivenoms approved, Crofab and Anavip. Crofab is the original, Anavip was just approved in 2015.

    1. Criteria for administration of Crofab or Anavip– significant progression of swelling, abnormal test results (plt less than 100k or fibrinogen less than 100), altered vital signs or altered mental status.

    2. Crofab is given as 6 vials, usually diluted into 1 L of NS and run over an hour. Repeat doses (2 vials) may be given if symptoms persist at 6, 12, and 18 hours. Patients should be monitored for allergic reactions.

    3. Anavip is a newer antivenom. It is given as 10 vials, repeated Q1H PRN for initial control of local signs of envenomation. 4 vials are given as maintenance for symptom recurrence.

Both antivenoms are quite expensive. Crofab is $3400 per vial and Anavip is $1200 a vial. Patients with systemic symptoms and receiving antivenom should go to the ICU.

Buchanan JT, Thurman J. Crotalidae Envenomation. [Updated 2022 Oct 3]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551615/

Hessel MM, McAninch SA. Coral Snake Toxicity. [Updated 2023 Mar 13]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519031/


VOTW: Soft Tissue Foreign Body

This week’s VOTW is brought to you by Dr. DeStefano and Dr. Wong!

A 3 year old female was brought into the ED a week after a she slid down a wooden pillar and suffered a splinter into her right thigh. A POCUS of the area showed…

Clip 1 is a POCUS of the posterior thigh that shows a small echogenic object with posterior acoustic shadowing. As the they scan through the area, we can tell that the object is linear, about 1cm in length and that its trajectory courses from the dermis to the subcutaneous layer and ends just before entering the muscle. There is no reverbration artifact which is consistent with wood. There is no surrounding signs of abscess of cellulitis.

POCUS for Foreign Bodies

Soft tissue foreign bodies can be imaged by x-ray, CT or ultrasound. Many of us reach for X-rays first but is that really the right move?

X-rays have poor sensitivity for foreign bodies especially for radiolucent objects such as plastic and wood(1). 

Ultrasound on the other hand is highly sensitive for foreign bodies, regardless of what the composition, and has the following advantages over X-rays including:

  1. No radiation

  2. Can map out the shape, trajectory, depth of the object at bedside

  3. Evaluate for involvement of tendons, muscles, joints

  4. Evaluate or complications such as cellulitis or abscess

  5. Guide removal of the object in real time (see videos below)

Characteristics of common foreign bodies on US

Glass: hyperechoic, + shadow, + reverb artifact

Metal: hyperechoic, + shadow, + reverb artifact

Wood: hyperechoic, + shadow, - reverb artifact

Plastic: hyperechoic, + shadow, - reverb artifact

Here is an example of metal which is hyperechoic with reverberation artifact (repeated hyperechoic horizontal lines extending deep to the object)

Metal foreign body with reverberation artifact

Technique

  1. Use a linear probe.

  2. Scan the area of interest in both transverse and sagittal.

  3. Look for a hyperechoic structure with posterior shadowing +/- reverbration artifact.

  4. Identify the shape, length, trajectory and surrounding structures.

  5. For very supericial foregin bodies, try using a water bath to increase the distance between the probe and foreign body (this brings the object closer to the "focal point", the part of image with the best "two-point discrimination" or resolution, which is closer to midway down the screen). Water also provides a great acoustic window.

Foreign body removal using ultrasound-guidance

Check out these great videos on how to use ultrasound to assist w/ foregin body removal

  1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x80NrSUNRrI

  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OeFDg1hZRDk

  3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1YQY7guUb0

Back to the patient:

The team identified the splinter in the soft tissue with no evidence of celluitis or abscess. The team approrpiately did not order an x-ray and saved the patient from unecessary radiation! The patient was referred to outpatient general surgery for evaluation for removal of the object.

References:

  1. Pattamapaspong N et al. Accuracy of radiography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing foreign bodies in the foot. Radiol Med. 2013 

  2. https://rebelem.com/pocus-and-soft-tissue-foreign-bodies/

  3. https://sjrhem.ca/detection-of-foreign-bodies-in-soft-tissue-a-pocus-guided-approach/