EMS Protocol of the Week - Supraventricular Tachycardia, Atrial Fibrillation / Atrial Flutter, Bradydysrhythmias and Complete Heart Block

So, a bit of housekeeping: 

 

Starting January 1, the NYC REMAC is switching over to the newest version of the city’s EMS protocols. A lot of the content will stay the same, although there will also be some new medications, some changes to dosages, and fair amount of clarified language. But the biggest difference you’ll see is a massive change to formatting. The new “Unified Protocols” get a major facelift, consolidating Certified First Responder (CFR), BLS, and ALS protocols into one contiguous document that reorganizes and hopefully simplifies the protocols for field providers and OLMC physicians alike. We’ll break down how to approach the new protocols after the holidays as they begin to pop up in these emails, but for now, we’ll use the last couple weeks of the year to get through as much of the remaining protocols as we can.

 

Ready? And away – we – go! 

 

Way, way back in an earlier EMS-PoW we discussed the EMS protocol for VT with a pulse/wide complex tachycardia, which itself was a part of Protocol 505 – Cardiac Dysrhythmias. For this week, I figured you’re all big enough protocol pros at this point to handle the rest of the dysrhythmia protocols, so here we have Protocol 505-A –  Supraventricular Tachycardia, Protocol 505-B – Atrial Fibrillation / Atrial Flutter, and Protocol 505-D – Bradydysrhythmias and Complete Heart Block. Let’s get into it!

 

The crux of the SVT and AF protocols comes down to the initial assessment of whether the patient is in a stable or unstable tachydysrhythmia. Is the patient hypotensive, altered, or otherwise hypoperfusing? Then synchronized cardioversion is indicated by Standing Order. Normotensive, mentating well? They’ll proceed down the protocol. 

 

For SVT, the crew will give up to the full 3 doses of adenosine (6-12-12) as SO. If the patient is still in (a stable) SVT at this point, they may call OLMC for orders to try diltiazem or amiodarone, or you may ask them to attempt synchronized cardioversion at this time. For a stable rapid atrial fibrillation/flutter, there are no SO meds that are given, so you’ll often get a call at the outset requesting diltiazem, although amiodarone is another MCO. Older thinking was that amiodarone might help control the rhythm while being gentler on the blood pressure than diltiazem, but seeing as amiodarone has its own issues as a medication, when a crew asks about giving it to a tachycardic patient with a borderline BP, I often ask them if they want to rethink cardioversion at that time. As far as diltiazem goes, everyone has their own opinion on whether to authorize its use for crews. For me, if the crew provides a clear enough picture of a narrow-complex tachycardia in an otherwise stable-sounding patient, I generally don’t have a problem with giving diltiazem; the half-life of a single IV push is short, and a touch of rate control may be just what the patient needs to prevent decompensation en route. Of course, this approval comes after first assessing whether there’s a compensatory reason for the patient to be tachycardic (hypovolemia, sepsis, etc.), in which case that should obviously be addressed first. 

 

For bradydysrhythmias or complete heart block, ALS will attempt a single 0.5mg dose of atropine and will often call for OLMC approval to give repeat doses up to a total of 3mg. Other MCOs include starting a dopamine infusion or administering pushes of calcium chloride or sodium bicarbonate if indicated. I would also note that transcutaneous pacing is listed as Standing Order for bradycardic patients who are showing signs of shock, although often times crews hesitate to start it on their own prior to calling OLMC. If that’s the case, and you feel like pacing the patient is indicated, be sure to remind them of that as an option.

 

That’s it for the dysrhythmias! Patient stable? Consider some meds. Unstable? Then electrical interventions are indicated. It’s the same “Medicine versus Edison” decision you’d go through in the ED! Just remember that for either synchronized cardioversion or transcutaneous pacing, the patient may need some sort of sedation, which requires OLMC approval. Refer to the previous Prehospital Sedation protocol overview for details there. Otherwise, www.nycremsco.org and the protocols binder are where it’s at!

 

Dave


EMS Protocol of the Week - Allergic / Anaphylactic Reaction (Adult and Pediatric)

I love taking requests!

 

EMS’s approach to anaphylaxis in NYC is explained across 4 different documents:

 

The four protocols all include degrees of overlap, which can make them a confusing read, but I’ll try to simplify it for you all as best I can. Fortunately, the upcoming version of the protocols for 2021 has a brand new formatting style that makes the transition from BLS to ALS levels of care easier to understand, but we’ll get to that in the coming weeks.

 

The reason why I’m including the relevant BLS protocols this week is because this is a rare occurrence where BLS can actually give an injectable medication and thus may need to call OLMC for its approval. Protocol 410 (BLS) provides background information on anaphylaxis for EMTs and instructions for evaluating whether epinephrine is indicated. If it is, EMTs are allowed by Standing Order to administer a single dose of IM epinephrine, either via a patient’s own auto-injector, the crew’s auto-injector, or a “Check and Inject” kit wherein EMTs draw the epi into clearly marked syringes, eliminating the need for dose calculations. Whether a crew carries auto-injectors or “Check and Inject” kits comes down to their service’s formulary. BLS crews can then contact OLMC in order to provide a second dose of epinephrine, if needed, so don’t be caught off guard if an EMT calls you with that request. 

 

Protocol 510 (ALS) also includes Standing Orders for IM epinephrine (allowing paramedics to draw it up themselves) while additionally including obtaining IV access for fluids, diphenhydramine, and steroids (methylprednisolone or dexamethasone), as well as albuterol and advanced airway management if necessary. Medical Control Options for OLMC include repeating any of the previous SOs as well as various pressor options for persistent hypotension (epinephrine drips are not yet an option, although push-dose epinephrine is).

 

The key distinctions of Protocol 455 (BLS) and Protocol 555 (ALS) is that they include more specific language for pediatric dosing of epinephrine. BLS is also supposed to call OLMC for approval prior to the first dose of epinephrine for a child if there was not previously a prescription for an epinephrine auto-injector, although if the BLS crew is unable to reach OLMC for some reason, they are permitted to give the dose emergently and reattempt contact with OLMC as soon as possible afterwards. 

 

Hope that didn’t overcomplicate things for you all! Keep reaching out with requests, emailing or texting with questions, and paying your respects to www.nycremsco.org and the protocols binder!

 

 

Dave

 · 

EMS Protocol of the Week - Smoke Inhalation and Cyanide Exposure

“What’s with all the doubling up on protocols, Dave?”

 

It’s called Being Efficient, get off my back! Plus, seeing as the subject was just thoroughly reviewed at conference, Protocol 500-A – Smoke Inhalation and Protocol 500-B – Cyanide Exposure are both timely and topical! Let’s get our spaced repetition on!

 

The real meat of both of these protocols concerns possible cyanide toxicity, although 500-A addresses it in the context of smoke and fire exposure (incidental, potentially secondary), while 500-B deals with cyanide as the potential primary pathogen. As such, both protocols lead with evaluating and managing ABCs, and 500-A includes a reminder to refer to the appropriate protocol for burns, if indicated (stay tuned, dear readers!). Both protocols then describe the scenarios in which cyanide antidotes may be indicated and should be administered – unexplained hypotension, AMS, coma, seizures, respiratory or cardiac arrest, all in the setting of presumed exposure to smoke and/or cyanide. The cyanide toxicity kits (previously only carried by FDNY EMS supervisors but as of 12/1/2020 are mandatory on all 911-system ALS units) contain hydroxocobalamin, sodium thiosulfate, and three blood tubes. Crews are instructed to draw blood samples into the tubes prior to administering the meds to provide reliable samples to receiving hospitals for running labs (this is currently the one instance where providers are drawing blood in the field!). Crews will generally look to administer hydroxocobalamin and sodium thiosulfate through two separate lines, although if only one vascular access site is available, they are instructed to administer the hydroxocobalamin first, followed by a 20 mL flush, in order to prevent its inactivation by sodium thiosulfate. For continued hypotension after administration of the cyanide toxicity kit, crews are allowed by SO to start vasopressors, either in the form of push-dose epinephrine, norepinephrine drip, or dopamine drip (as previously discussed in the Cardiogenic Shock protocol).

 

The last thing to note for this week is the introduction to Protocol 500-B. If a crew arrives on the scene of a suspected cyanide exposure where there are 5 or more patients, the scenario has pushed into MCI territory, and crews are instructed to approach it as a potential WMD attack. As such, the protocol calls for a FDNY Medical Director to give a Class Order, which generally kicks off disaster policies and procedures enacted through FDNY’s city-wide infrastructure. If the time ever comes where a crew calls our OLMC reporting an MCI scenario with cyanide, you should refer them to FDNY OLMC or FDNY Emergency Medical Dispatch, as these are the places that can operationally mobilize the appropriate wide-scale resources needed for the situation.

 

See? Two protocol birds, one email stone, and you’re all stronger for it. See you all next week for another protocol (or five)! Until then, keep checking www.nycremsco.org or the protocols binder!

 

 

Dave