Ultrasound-Guided PIV Placement Part 2 POD

The following is a powerful advanced technique that can be used to troubleshoot traditional short-axis US-PIV placement.

A familiar scenario: The elusive needle tip!

  • You’re placing an US-guided PIV and going ahead with your short axis technique

  • The vessel is directly under the center of the probe, right on that Bx-guide line

  • You know exactly how deep it is

  • The needle has entered the skin… the tip should be right over or very near the vessel…

  • But where is it??? You’re bouncing the needle a little and see tissue moving, you’re slowly sweeping the probe backward and forward where your needle tip should be, but it continues to elude you! Maybe it’s a little deep, maybe there’s some echogenic (bright) tissue hiding it, doesn’t matter, here’s what to do...

The answer: Long Axis — Hear me out!

  • Take your eyes off of the ultrasound screen

  • Pick up the probe and place it back down, marker toward you, exactly along the axis of the angiocath, DIRECTLY over it!

  • Without moving your hand, look back up at the screen. Unless you’re at a crazy steep angle, you will see your whole needle clearly!

  • If you see the vessel on the screen as well, you are now perfectly set up to continue placing your IV

  • Position the tip in the vessel lumen, then advance the angiocath over the needle as you normally would

Image result for long axis ultrasound guided IV

The other scenario: You’ve positioned the probe over the needle, you look up and see the needle but not the vessel any more, or maybe part of the vessel — here’s what you do

  • Slide/rotate the probe such that you have the vessel in view at its widest diameter on the screen

  • Then LOOK BACK AT THE ARM

  • If the probe is now to the right of the needle, you need to redirect to the right; if the probe is to the left, the needle needs to go left

  • Withdraw the needle a few mm and then redirect so that it is inline with the ultrasound

  • As you do this, look back up at the screen and you should see the needle coming into view

In a nutshell: If you’ve lost your needle tip

1. Use the probe to show you where the needle is

2. Use the probe to show you where the vessel is

3. With the probe over the vessel, position the needle so that it’s directly under the probe

4. Now all three are lined up and you’re ready to position the needle tip in the vessel lumen

A few last tips:

  • You can fine-tune your left-right control of needle tip in long axis by just moving the needle slightly one way or the other and seeing if it comes more into view or less into view — this will start happening automatically if you practice this technique a few times

  • I still recommend letting go of the probe and advancing the angiocath with non-dominant hand, however if an assistant takes the probe when you are ready to advance the angiocath, you can watch it go into the vessel and ensure that it is advancing smoothly into the lumen.

  • You can do this with one person as well but this requires advancing the angiocath and stabilizing the needle with one hand, which is more difficult and gives little tactile feedback as to whether it is advancing smoothly or meeting resistance

  • Once you’re comfortable with this long-axis technique, try doing the entire procedure in long axis. This tends to work very well for deeper, straighter veins.

  • There’s no reason you can’t switch back to short once you’ve found your needle tip and repositioned it; perhaps it’s a twisty vessel with multiple turns and you need to walk it in a little more - short axis is better for navigating in the left-right direction (as long as you’ve located your needle tip!)

  • Remember the concept of "angle of insonation": the steeper your needle angle, the more difficult it will be to see your needle because fewer ultrasound beams are bouncing back to the probe (more are being deflected in a different direction)

Jonas Pologe, PGY3, Emergency Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center

 · 
Share

POD Aortic Dissection

A patient came to the north side today with an acute aortic dissection. Here are images obtained by the ultrasound team when the patient first came in.

A suprasternal view showing an intimal flap:

suprasternal.jpg

A short axis view of the abdominal aorta showing an intimal flap

abdominal.jpg

Diagnosis was made, BP meds started, cardiothoracic consulted, and CT expedited.

CT showed a severe type B thoracoabdominal aortic dissection:

CT-aorta.jpg

Aortic Dissection

Pathophysiology:

Tear in the intima (inner most layer), bleeding into the media (middle layer)

Pathophysiology_Theaorticdissectionsoriginatewithanintimaltearin_Ascendingaorta65Aorticarch10.jpg

Diagnosis of aortic dissection is very time sensitive:

mortality is directly proportional to time elapsed between symptom onset and diagnosis/treatment

.

How does it eventually kill you? (I think it’s important to ask this question about all disease processes)

acute aortic regurgitation —> cardiogenic shock

Cardiac tamponade —> obstructive shock

Major brach-vessel obstruction —> vasodilatory shock from dead organ or limb

Aortic rupture —> hemorrhagic shock

2 types that we care about: Stanford Type A and Stanford Type B

types.jpg

Type A

:

involves ascending aorta

— surgical — a/w aortic rupture, tamponade, aortic regurg, AMI, stroke — more common (68%)

Type B

:

does not involve ascending aorta — medical (BP control and monitoring) — a/w limb/organ ischemia  — less common, (32%) — usually originates just distal to L subclavian artery

Classic history: old person,

very hypertensive

;

abrupt onset

,

tearing/ripping chest pain

,

radiating to bac

k; a/w neuro symptoms e.g.

weakness/numbness

(due to vessel branch occlusion); a/w syncope/diaphoresis/N/V

Other risk factors include Marfan’s, connective tissue disease, FHx aortic disease, known aortic valve disease, recent aortic manipulation (e.g. TAVR, surgery), known thoracic aortic aneurysm, tobacco;  rarely 3rd trimester pregnancy, TB, syphilis,  vasculitis, blunt trauma

Classic physical: Pulse deficit (present in <20% of cases), unequal BP in upper/lower extremities, neuro deficits, signs of tamponade

Diagnosis:

Labs: basics, coags, trop, consider d-dimer (actually high sensitivity/NPV for dissection due to blood often clotting I false lumen)

CT angio aorta: gold standard for diagnosis of aortic dissection

CXR: not sensitive, not specific — sometimes mediastinal or aortic knob widening, few other nonspecific signs

TEE: is an excellent modality that’s in the works but we don’t have it operational yet

TTE: next best thing, as usual with ultrasound it’s specific but not sensitive - see below

Ultrasound for aortic dissection — obtain the following views:

Subxiphoid: look for pericardial effusion

Image result for subxiphoid effusion'

Parasternal long: look for effusion, look at the descending aorta, look for aortic regurg with color doppler and measure the aortic root (nl <4cm) if you want to be fancy

para-long.jpg

Suprasternal window:

look for dissection flap (image from University of Maryland department of cardiology)

Probe above the the patient’s sternum pointed inferoposteriorly with probe marker to patient’s left (assuming cardiology convention)

SSNV.jpg

Abdominal aorta scan: look for dissection flap from diaphragm to iliacs, also measure diameter in short and long

Management (From the AAC/AHA aortic dissection guidelines):

ACC AHA AoD Treatment-Algorithm

Note: When blood pressure is intact, first bring heart rate with beta blockers, then control pain, then see if they need further BP control.

 · 
Share

The Bougie POD

Awwww yisss, airway stuff!

I’d like to start this POD off by talking about the study that got everyone buzzing about the bougie this summer, published last June in JAMA by Driver et al. at Hennepin:

Effect of Use of a Bougie vs Endotracheal Tube and Stylet on First-Attempt Intubation Success Among Patients With Difficult Airways Undergoing Emergency Intubation, A Randomized Clinical Trial

Numbers and outcomes:

  • They randomized 757 patients: 381 to a bougie-first approach, 376 to a traditional styletted ETT-first approach

  • Population was >18, undergoing intubation with a Macintosh (standard geometry) blade (direct or video, how much the intubator looked at the screen was at the teams discretion)

  • 380 patients had at least one difficult airway feature

  • Success on 1st attempt was 98% in bougie-first group vs 87% in ETT+stylet group, P=0.0001, NNT=9

  • Success on 1st attempt in patients with difficult airway features was 96% in bougie-first group vs 82% in ETT+stylet group, P<0.0001, NNT=7

Let’s just state what that last NNT means in words to let it sink in: You have use a bougie on 7 patients with difficult airway features in order to prevent one first-pass failure.

Furthermore, the bougie held its own among every stratification, e.g.:

  • Obese patients: (96% vs 75%)

  • Patients that needed cervical in-line stabilization: (100% vs 78%,)

  • Patients with poor views (Cormack-Lehane grades 2 to 4): (97% vs 60%)

A few other noteworthy things:

  • The duration of the first pass was about the same between bougie and ETT groups,

  • The total time of intubation was far longer in the ETT group, owing to more often needing multiple attempts passes

  • No difference in complication rate or direct airway trauma

Bottom line: This is extremely compelling evidence that first pass success is improved with use of a bougie.

We massively underutilize the bougie. Let’s improve our first pass success and use it more often.

I would especially consider using a bougie as first pass if you’re a less-experienced intubator or you’re starting to learn DL. Furthermore, even if you want to be old school and use it “only as a backup/rescue device”, heaven help you if you actually have to use it as such and have never practiced using it.

For anyone that may not be 100% familiar…

How to use a bougie:

  • get a view

  • pass your bougie through the cords, the coudé tip helps guide it anteriorly where it needs to go

  • you know you’re in the trachea because it stops around the carina (be gentle, airway perforations are sub-optimal), you can also theoretically feel the subtle clicking of the tracheal rings as it slides down the trachea

  • your assistant slides the tube over the back end of the bougie and then stabilizes the back of the bougie while you railroad the tube over it and through the cords

  • keep retracting the tongue with the laryngoscope while you do this to facilitate passage

  • you may encounter some resistance when it reaches the arytenoids; twisting the tube solves this problem

  • you can definitely do all this by yourself too, it’s just a little trickier to maneuver all the moving parts

The bougies used in the Hennepin study were 70 cm gum elastic (blue) bougies, the same ones we stock in our ED. These as well as slightly shorter 60cm bougies are stocked in most departments you might work in. Thanks to Reuben we also now stock the purple malleable bougies! These excellent devices and will save you when you run into weird geometry and can even be used with hyperangulated laryngoscopes but this is a little harder. When I use them as a regular bougie, I’ll usually give them a slight coudé tip and mild anterior bend like that of the ETT and revise if necessary. The stopper can be taken off or used to pre-load the tube.

 · 
Share