Catatonia

The subject of today's pearl of the day is

catatonia

.

One day a long time ago, in another galaxy, in Resus: there was a young-ish obtunded patient with a history of bipolar disorder who was brought in as notification for altered mental status. He was completely unresponsive. He was mute, stuporous, and “rigid” (however this was more likely waxy flexibility).  His medical workup including neuroimaging was negative. He eventually was diagnosed with catatonia. This is an uncommon presentation that we do sometimes see in the ED. 

Catatonia is not specific to any particular disorder and can be seen in virtually all psychiatric disorders.

Catatonia can also be the result of an undiagnosed medical condition. 

Catatonia can occur in up to 35% of patients with schizophrenia

at some point in their life, but as per DSM-V, it is more commonly seen in patients with bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder (most likely because these diseases are more prevalent). 

Apparently, 20% of hospitalized patients diagnosed with catatonia actually had a medical cause, either neurologic, toxicologic, metabolic, or infectious.

Two-third's of medical catatonic patients had central nervous system etiology

. So the medical workup should include neuroimaging and LP to rule out encephalitis. 

As per the DSM-V,

catatonia includes 3 or more of the following

:

stupor, catalepsy, waxy flexibility, mutism, negativism, posturing, mannerism, stereotypy, agitation, grimacing, echolalia, echopraxia

. (I attached the DSM-V criteria which have definitions of those terms). 

The mainstay of treatment in the emergent psychiatric settings is Benzodiazepine (BZD) therapy

. Ironically, increasing GABA signaling can break someone out of a state of catatonia, which clinically can appear as an already neurologically depressed state.

A meta analysis of BZD treatment shows remission rates anywhere from 66-100%

However, Cochrane reviews regarding treatment of catatonia found no significant difference between BZD treatment, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), and placebo.

There is a possibility that

the field of psychiatry has not sufficiently differentiated the etiologies of catatonia

to stratify patients into distinct treatment groups. 

Although the subjective experience of the catatonic patient remains unclear, I like to think of it as the

worst anxiety attack you could ever imagine

. This mostly is for the stuporous, cataleptic, and mute patient. 

Investigating this further, a retrospective German study interviewed patients who had recovered from their catatonia. They found that predominating symptoms were either intense anxiety due to uncontrollable emotions or profound ambivalence and cognitive paucity. This suggests

there are at least several subjective mental states that create the same clinical picture of catatonia

(not including the medical causes). 

Regarding the putative etiology of catatonia that derives from profound lack of emotion and paucity of ideas, this seems to be more derived from the negative symptoms of schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorders. There are conflicting data that seem to support a trial of BZD as well, and clinical practice is to give BZD. We can let our psychiatry colleagues decide if their inpatient hospital course portends electricity to the brain in the form of ECT. Defibrillation works for the heart, why not for the brain,

right

For a patient in the ED setting with catatonia who has had a negative medical workup, a trial of BZD therapy is totally appropriate and may completely reverse their catatonia. If you strongly suspect catatonia, you could trial BZD therapy while the medical workup is in progress.

In summary:

an acutely catatonic patient needs full medical workup and some BZD's if their clinical picture supports their use

dsmvcatatonia.png

ADDENDUM:

These posts are generated by the resident who is on their Senior Teaching/Admin rotation. The resident sends these posts out to the faculty, resident, and student list serves.

Dr. Yassir Mahgoub, MD, a psychiatry attending at Maimonides responded with this fantastic post:

Thanks a lot for sharing this summary about your catatonic patient and information about catatonia.

Catatonia happens to be one of my favorite and fascinating syndromes. It was once described as the great imitator, similar to syphilis, as it can have different and complex presentations. In our inpatient unit, we will usually have 1-2 catatonic patient at any given time and despite seeing many catatonic patients, I continue to miss it. The rate in a psychiatric inpatient population is about 10%.

Historically and for many decades, catatonia was linked to schizophrenia but many studies found catatonia to be more common among patients with mood disorders and even in medical problems. DSM-V finally recognized catatonia as a separate condition and literature described over 40 sings of catatonia. Current DSM-V recognizes 12 sings.

Recognizing catatonia is an important step in management. If you don’t know what you are looking for during assessment and monitoring of management, the condition can be misdiagnosed or mismanaged.

Bush-Francis Catatonia scale, a widely used tool that has 23 items, helps to diagnose and to monitor progress of treatment of catatonia.

http://turkpsikiyatri.org/arsiv/bush-francis_catatonia_rating_scale.pdf

Mutism, Immobility, stupor, staring,  and posturing tend to occur more frequently than other sings while other sings such automatic obedience, verbigeration, waxy flexibility, Echolalia and Echopraxia tend to be less frequently.

Stereotype, being defined as repetitive non-goal directed behavior, might be very challenging to recognize as it can be as simple as shaking a hand up and down or a more complex behavior, such turning the AC switch, or power switch on and off for hours. I came across more complex behavior that occurred with other catatonic symptoms, such as repeated self-induced vomiting in an autistic patient to a repeated eating of feces in a schizophrenic patient!

Excitement can be very interesting when present, as it can alternate with stupor. Some of our resident can recall a stupors immobile patient, who we had to keep on 1:1 for her safety, as she used to lay in bed for minutes and suddenly she would jump to floor and hit her head.

Treatment is mainly with benzodiazepines or ECT, and also by treating the primary psychiatric or medical condition.

Few points to remember about catatonia:

1.Catatonia course, in the absence of treatment, can last for months or years. On the other hand, it can have waxing and waning or even cyclical course. If you see a patient exhibiting catatonic signs in the morning and behaving normally in the evening, it is still catatonia!

2. Catatonia might respond to a benzodiazepine challenge; however, the response can be instant or delayed. It is important to have an objective measure for monitoring as know if the patient is improving or not and whether to proceed with increasing the dose of lorazepam or to consider ECT.  2 weeks ago, we had a patient who developed catatonia after he smoked K2. He showed response to increasing doses of Ativan and his catatonic signs resolved on 16 mg of Ativan daily after 5-6 days “he was walking and communicating and was not sedated”. Literature suggest increasing the dose of Ativan up 20 mg daily and in some patients up to 30 mg per day, if patient is responsive to benzodiazepine and not showing complete resolution of symptoms.

3.Try to describe signs as you see them and refrain from vague, nonspecific descriptions such as “disorganized behavior” as many of our catatonic patient were described to be “disorganized”

4.Be mindful of the lethal presentation of catatonia, which has the same presentation, pathology and treatment of Neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Many authors consider Neuroleptic malignant syndrome as malignant catatonia induced by medications. Fever, autonomic instability, and rhabdomyolysis can occur in the course of catatonia, which will require supportive treatment.

This page has more information and videos of catatonia.

http://sites.psu.edu/catatonia/

 · 
Share

Suction cannisters in series

Today during my TR shift, CY asked me for demonstration of how to connect suction canisters in series for large volume paracentesis.

Before we go into the actual technique, lets take a second to understand how the suction canister functions. This is not our exact model of suction canister lid, but is functionally the same. See my infographic below:

suction-kanister-explained.jpg

The goal: to connect 3 of the vacuum canisters together so that when one fills, the fluid then starts draining into the next. Once the second fills it will drain into third and automatically stop.

With this technique you can perform your paracentesis, start drainage, and then safely walk away. Please instruct your patient not to move whilst drainage is in action.

So connect one suction canister with vacuum tubes as you normally would: vacuum to wall suction; the next vacuum tube should go from either of the avalvulous ports to the next avalvulous port. Critical point: the only port that needs to be connected to the ballast valve port is the port that plugs into wall suction. All subsequent ports should be connected in series with the avalvulous ports.

The final attachment is the avalvulous port to christmas tree adapter, which is included in our thora/paracentesis kit.

During what I believe was my intern year, I had shown Strayer this technique, and much to my chagrin, he tweeted out a post about it. See below:

strayers_ccannister-post-1.jpg
suction-kanister-explained.jpg

The benefits of utilizing this technique for large volume paracentesis are twofold: (1) increased safety and (2) utilization of resources (in this case physician time). Safety is increased because this method does not utilize sharp needles to transfer fluid to a vacuum flask; thereby, it reduces the risk of needle stick injury (especially important for the population of patients that need ED paracenteses). Utilization of resources is improved because a physician does not need to remain at bedside or repeatedly check the progress of evacuation, assessing for need to switch to the next vacuum flask.

For large volume paracentesis, I recommend only connecting a max of 4 of our suction canisters in series. I typically do 3, but 4 approaches that max of 5L that current thought suggests may cause hemodynamically significant fluid shifts.

 · 
Share

Electrophysiology 101

One of my favorite topics that is as nerdy (if not more so) than toxicology is a subspecialty of cardiology called electrophysiology. While I am not an expert at any field at this point, I certainly enjoyed learning from our prestigious faculty in the CICU. This is the first of a 2 part pearl of the day. The next pearl of the day, we will get into the various modes of pacemaking and what they mean.

So let us review: pacemakers, AICD’s, the different varieties, why people have them, and what we as ED providers need to know.

Electrical Conduction system of the heart

I have attached an infographic showing the various points of heart block. Notice how the left posterior fascicle has many conducting fibers. This important, because in the setting of RBBB + LAFB, there are many conducting fibers left so the conducting system is more robust and unlikely to go into complete heartblock. However, in the setting of a RBBB + LPFB, there is only the tiny fibers of the LAF conducting to the rest of the heart; so these patients need a pacemaker.

electrical-conducting-system-of-the-heart-text.jpg

Pacemakers

Complete heartblock or ecg findings that they will likely soon develop complete heart block (eg mobitz type 2 and combined RBBB with left posterior fascicular block) are indications for pacemaker placement. If they are unstable on presentation, they need an emergently placed transvenous pacer.

A single lead pacemaker tunnels through the venous system and delivers electrical impulses to the right ventricle. The wave of depolarization starts in the right ventricle; thus, the ECG finding of a paced rhythm is of a widened QRS seen in a LBBB.

For patients with reduced EF’s who need pacing, there is a current trend to place biventricular pacemakers. With these devices, a lead is placed into both the right and left chamber of the heart. This is termed cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Because both the chambers of the heart are paced simultaneously, the QRS narrows and it is thought this improves EF.

Automatic implantable Cardiac Defibrillators (AICD’s)

There are various models of AICD’s and are capable of providing single chamber pacing and CRT in all of the various modes depending on model. There main function is to monitor the heart for dangerous arrhythmia and deliver electrify to abort the dangerous rhythm (usually tach or vfib).

Aside from there pacemaking and/or automatic defibrillator function, all of these devices are essentially continuous cardiac monitors. As such, any patient who has one of these devices who presents to our ED can have there device interrogated.

Mostly for the interns: any syncope, report of AICD discharge, palpitations, etc with an implantable device should have there device interrogated.

Special note: placing a magnet on an AICD will turn off the defibrillator mode. This should be performed after a failed resuscitation or in a DNR/DNI patient at the point of death.

 · 
Share