Pediatric cardiac arrests are high stress scenarios in the best of times, so you can imagine how much more taxing they may be in the out-of-hospital setting, with even fewer resources. Keeping things heavily protocolled may be beneficial in these cases, giving EMS a fixed task list to complete to help work through all the chaos of the situation.
We’ve got a few key differences between the pediatric cardiac arrest protocol (which includes all arrest rhythms) and the adult counterparts we just covered. One is the increased emphasis on ventilator support and appropriate CPR at the CFR level, particularly given the heavy respiratory component of most pediatric arrests. Two is the increased priority of initiating transport at the BLS level, as opposed to many adult arrests that are often extensively worked up on the scene. And three is the high detail on defibrillation when indicated, utilizing appropriate Joules (or the lowest setting if unable to administer at the weight-based amount) and pad sizing. Medical Control Options look a little different here compared to the adult protocols, leading off with naloxone (again, considering respiratory etiologies), and following off with options for dextrose, bicarb, magnesium, or crystalloid.
Recognize that most of the paramedic interventions – and hence the calls for MCOs – will take place en route to the hospital, given how early in the protocol BLS is instructed to begin transport. But also realize that these transports can occasionally be prolonged, and they may feel excruciatingly drawn out for the paramedics sitting with the patient in the back of the ambulance, desperate for something to do. So listen closely to their presentations on the OLMC phone, give some real considerations to the meds they’re looking to give, and do what you can to work in tandem with them in those crucial minutes before they hit our ambulance bay.
That’ll do it for this week, see you all next week, and give some love to www.nycremsco.org or the protocol binder.
Dave
- Medications
- Pharmacology
- Respiratory / Pulm
- POCUS
- Infectious Disease
- Ophthalmology
- Airway
- Obstetrics / Gynecology
- Environmental
- Procedures
- Foreign Body
- Pediatrics
- Cardiovascular
- EKG
- Critical Care
- Radiology
- Emergency
- Admin
- Orthopedics
- Nerve Blocks
- DVT
- Finance
- EMS
- Benzodiazepines
- Neurology
- Medical Legal
- Psychiatry
- Anal Fissure
- Hemorroids
- Bupivacaine
- Ropivacaine
- EM
- Neck Trauma
- Emergency Medicine
- Maisonneuve Fracture
- Diverticulitis
- Corneal Foreign Body
- Gabapentin
- Lethal Analgesic Dyad
- Opioids
- Galea Laceration
- Dialysis Catheter
- Second Victim Syndrome
- Nasal Septal Hematoma
- Nephrology / Renal
- Hematology / Oncology
- Dental / ENT
- Dermatology
- Endocrine
- Gastroenterology
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- May 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
Precordial Thump
Background: Who's hitting what now?
The precordial thump is a popularized emergency medicine procedure performed on medical television shows where the practitioner, slams their fist onto the patient's chest- the patient then wakes up, thanks the doctor, and is then seen walking out of the hospital.
Of course real life is hardly as fun as it can be on television shows- or is it actually? Though I wasn't there to bear witness, I'm told of two relatively recent examples by my colleagues where they've used the technique. In one event, the patient remained in the same rhythm as they started, and in the second example, the patient was, well, thumped right out of their pulseless Vtach. This POTD is inspired by those events. When should I be considering the precordial thump? How does it work? Does it even work?
First descriptions of this procedure date back to the 1920s. The idea is to deliver enough force with a physical blow to cause coordinate cardiac depolarization, replacing the effect that the shock of defibrillation has on the heart during a shockable rhythm. There are anecdotes of patients with unstable rhythms getting "shocked" out of rhythms when the ambulance they were in ran over a pothole, converting them to sinus rhythm. Most ED physicians would tell you of the low success rates of the thump, but most also seem to know a doc, who knows a doc, with whom the precordial thump saved a life.
Indications: When a patient has a witnessed, monitored, unstable ventricular rhythm when a defibrillator is not immediately available. This namely applies to vfib and pulseless vtach. Depending on who you ask, this could done on a patient who starts decompensating before your eyes and before the defibrillator pads are attached. The blow is thought to generate about 5 joules (or maybe 10 if Q does it). Though hardly the amount of joules delivered by defibrillation, and though unlikely to cause depolarization, it can perhaps be justified if the red cart and pads are just a bit too far away.
How to do it: With the patient supine, position your hand 20-30cm above a patient's chest, and strike with the ulnar surface of your fist onto the lower 1/3 of the patient's chest (bonus points if you say "Live, Dammit!" the moment before the strike). Immediately recoil the fist post strike.
But...does it work?
A quick dive into the literature reveals....its ultimately not very effective, especially when compared to defibrillation. But as with any medical topic with poor supporting literature, the efficacy for the precordial thump are mixed.
Many case reports, and a study by Pellis et al., showed up to 25% of patients treated with a precordial thump regained ROSC.
Other reports like Koster et al. showed that an initial precordial thump performed immediately at onset of ventricular arrhythmia only terminated the rhythm of 2 out of 153 patients.
Nehme et al showed, in a retrospective study looking at 434 patients with VF or pulseless VT, 103 were first treated with a precordial thump (followed by defibrillation if unsuccessful) and the other 325 were treated immediately with defibrillation. In the thump group, 5/103 patients achieved ROSC , and for the immediate defibrillation group 188/325 achieved ROSC. Additionally, for the thump group, 10 of the 103 shifted into a more dangerous rhythm, such as VF to asystole.
Possible side effects: Though the precordial thump is attempted in the event of an unstable, shockable rhythm, it can precipitate the opposite effect, and send the patient into a more unstable rhythm or asystole. Blunt intrathoracic trauma can also noted, including rib/sternal fractures, and if performed incorrectly, intraabdominal injury such as liver laceration from a broken xiphoid.
Conclusion: Between the precordial thump and defibrillating the patient with an unstable ventricular rhythm, don't even think: defibrillation is vastly superior. If defibrillation is available, use it every time. The precordial thump should NOT delay defibrillation and early CPR. It should NOT be used for unwitnessed out of hospital cardiac arrest. But if access to defibrillation is not immediately accessible, this is another possible tool in your arsenal. Just don't expect it to work very well.
Sources: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK545174/
POTD: IV Contrast Allergy
A prior allergic-like reaction to IV iodinated contrast is the most substantial risk factor for a recurrent reaction.
Up to 35% of patients will experience a recurrence if no premedication prophylaxis is given
Patients with a prior mild reaction have a very low risk < 1% chance of developing a moderate or severe reaction
It is currently controversial weather premedicating before a contrast study prevents a recurrent allergic reaction.
A randomized control study showed that premedication decreased the rate of allergic-like reactions in patients exposed to older high osmolar iodinated contrast. This is not directly related to the current contrast medium that is used.
Another study was performed that looked at low-osmolar iodinated contrast which we currently use and the study showed decrease in overall rate of allergic type reactions of mild reactions but no there was no statistically significant difference for moderate or severe reactions.
Recommendations:
o For patients with prior mild reactions (limited hives/itching, limited cutaneous edema, itchy/scratchy throat, nasal congestion, sneezing/conjunctivitis, rhinorrhea) either no premedication prophylaxis or premedication consisting only of an antihistamine prior to planned imaging study.
Rationale for this:
Mild allergic reactions typically do not require medical treatment
Patients with mild reactions have a low risk of developing moderate or severe future reactions
Effectiveness of steroid prophylaxis for preventing this type of reaction is uncertain
One study actually showed that for patients with prior mild reactions they had less severe reactions when only antihistamine was administered rather than steroid + antihistamine.
In patients with history of prior moderate or severe prior allergic-type reaction or patients with whom the severity of a prior allergic-type contrast reaction is unknown should receive oral premedication with a corticosteroid and an antihistamine beginning 12 hours prior to expected contrast administration. For patients in need of emergent imaging there are accelerated premedication protocols.
General Guidelines at MMC:
Mild Reaction: no pre-medication
Moderate Reaction: pre-medicate and/or use a different contrast agent
Severe: Do not give contrast unless there has been an attending level discussion with both the primary team and radiology attending that the benfit outweighs the risks and documentation for the reason of administration of contrast is done.
Our Policies at MMC
Adult Routine Premedication:
o 50mg Prednisone PO 13, 7, and 1 hour before administration of contrast
o 50mg diphenhydramine IV/PO within 1 hour of the injection
Adult Faster Premedication (no evidence of efficacy at less than 4 hours)
o 200mg hydrocortisone IV every 4 hours prior to administration of IV contrast
o 50mg diphenhydramine IV/PO within 1 hour of the injection
Pediatric Routine Premedication (
o Prednisone 0.7mg/kg (not to exceed 50mg) PO or IV 13, 7, and.1 hour prior to administration of contrast
o Diphenhydramine 1mg/kg IV/PO (not to exceed 50mg) within 1 hour of the injection
Pediatric Faster Premedication
o Hydrocortisone 2mg/kg (not to exceed 200mg) IV every 4 hours prior to administration of contrast
o Diphenhydramine 1mg/kg IV/PO (not to exceed 50mg) within 1 hour of the injection
The minimum amount of time needed for steroids to be effective based on previous studies is administration of steroid at least 4 hours prior to administration of contrast.
If you are every unsure the best thing to do is page our radiology colleagues and have a discussion with them. Many institutions have different protocols for premedicating patients for contrast studies so make sure to get familiar with whatever protocol the hospital has. Below is some common standard protocols used at other institutions.
Below are some other common combinations done at other institutions
Prior Mild Contrast Reaction - Premedication Protocol
Adult or Pediatric Patients > 50kg
No premedication OR
Premedication with antihistamine
Cetirizine (Zyrtec) 10mg by mouth 1 hour prior to imaging
Pediatric Patients < 50kg
No premedication OR
Premedication with antihistamine
Certerizine (Zyrtec)
Children 6 years and above: 10mg by mouth 1 hour prior to study
Children 2-5 years: 5mg by mouth 1 hour prior to imaging study
Children < 2 years do not use certirizine
Prior Moderate, Severe, or Unknown Severity Contrast Reaction - Premedication Protocol
Adult or Pediatric Patients > 50kg
Premedication with corticosteroid and antihistamine
Methylprednisolone (Solu-Medrol) 32mg by mouth 12 hours and 2 hours prior to imaging AND
Certirizine 10mg by mouth 1 hour prior to study
Pediatric Patients < 50kg
Premedication with corticosteroid and antihistamine
Methylprednisolone 1mg/kg (up to 32mg)_by mouth 12 hours and 2 hours prior to imaging AND
Certirizine
Children 6 years and above: 10mg by mouth 1 hour prior to study
Children 2-5 years: 5mg by mouth 1 hour prior to imaging study
Children < 2 years do not use certirizine
IV Alternatives for Patients Who CANNOT Take Oral Medications
Adult or Pediatric Patients > 50kg
Corticosteroid
Hydrocortisone 200mg IV 12 hours and 2 hours prior to imaging.
Antihistamine
Diphenhydramine 50mg IV 1 hour prior to study
Pediatric Patients < 50kg
Methylprednisolone 1mg/kg (up to 32mg) IV 12 hours and 2 hours prior to imaging
Diphenhydramine 1mg/kg (up to 50mg) IV 1 hour prior to study
Accelerated Premedication Protocol
Adult or Pediatric Patients > 50kg
Premedication with corticosteroid and antihistamine
Hydrocortisone 200mg IV 5 given 5 hours and 1 hour prior to imaging AND
Benadryl 50mg IV given 1 hour prior to imaging study
Pediatric Patients < 50kg
Premedication with corticosteroid and antihistamine
Methylprenisolone 1mg/kg (up to 32mg) IV 5 hours and 1 hour prior to imaging study AND
Diphenhydramine 1mg/kg (up to 50mg) IV 1 hour prior to imaging study
References: